Coinciding with the announcement of the National Innovation Ecosystem proposed by the US Council on Competitiveness, Japan?s Industrial Structure Council proposed a significant shift from a technology policy to an innovation policy based on the ecosystem concept. Aiming at analyzing the complex mutual relations between human activities centered around industry and the surrounding environment, Japan?s Ministry of International Trade and Industry postulated the concept of Industrial Ecology in the early 1970s. In the US, a similar policy was initiated by the National Academy of Engineering in the early 1990s corresponding to the mutually inspiring cycle in the two nations. The basic principle of Industrial Ecology suggests substitution among available production factors in a closed system in order to achieve sustainable development under certain constraints. Based on this concept, Japan achieved notable energy efficiency improvement in the 1980s that can be attributed to technology substitution for energy. Contrary to its economic stagnation in the 1980s, the US achieved significant economic development in the 1990s while Japan experienced a ?lost decade? due to economic stagnation. The US success can be attributed to information technology (IT) substitution for traditional manufacturing technology, leading to new functionality development. However, after the bursting of the IT bubble, the US has been confronting again the ?new reality.? While the US and Japan demonstrated contrasting success through mutual inspiration, given a new paradigm in a post-information society toward a ubiquitous society in the early 2000s. They need a new approach for sustaining their national innovation. Recognition of this led both countries to re-examine the broader application of the ecosystem discipline, leading to the National Innovation Ecosystem concept. This paper, based on an empirical review of the technology policy of the US and Japan over the last three decades focusing on the ecosystem perspective, attempts to demonstrate the above hypothetical view and provides new insight for a service oriented economy.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.